Do Schools Have to Teach About Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)?

Introduction

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is a practice that has been happening for centuries, and is still occurring today in many countries around the world. It involves the partial or complete removal of the external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. In recent years, there has been much debate about whether or not schools should be teaching about FGM and its consequences. In this article, we will explore the arguments for and against teaching about FGM in schools.

What is FGM?

FGM is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as “all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons”. It is a cultural practice that is often carried out in an effort to control female sexuality and is seen as a way to ensure premarital virginity and marital fidelity. There are four types of FGM, ranging from the removal of the clitoral hood to the complete removal of all external female genitalia, including the clitoris, labia and vaginal opening.
FGM is a human rights violation and is considered to be a form of gender-based violence. It is illegal in many countries, including the UK. Despite this, it is estimated that over 200 million women and girls are affected by FGM worldwide.

Arguments for Teaching About FGM

The main argument for teaching about FGM in schools is that it is an important issue that needs to be addressed. FGM is a serious human rights violation that has devastating physical, psychological and social consequences for women and girls, and education can help to raise awareness of these issues and the dangers associated with FGM.
Education can also help to challenge the cultural norms and beliefs that perpetuate FGM, as well as increasing knowledge of the legal and medical implications of the practice. Teaching about FGM in schools can also help to challenge the stigma and silence that can surround the issue, and encourages open and honest conversations about the subject.

Related content  What Does HT Mean in Basketball?

Arguments Against Teaching About FGM

The main argument against teaching about FGM in schools is that it could be seen as offensive or insensitive. It is a sensitive subject and some people may feel uncomfortable discussing it in a classroom setting. There is also a risk that it could be seen as a form of cultural imperialism, as it could be argued that it is imposing Western values on other cultures and ignoring the cultural context in which FGM is practiced.
Another argument against teaching about FGM is that it could be seen as victim-blaming. It could be argued that it is placing the responsibility for ending FGM on the victims rather than on the perpetrators.

Conclusion

In conclusion, there is a strong argument for teaching about FGM in schools. It is a serious human rights violation that requires urgent attention and education can be a powerful tool for raising awareness and challenging the cultural norms and beliefs that perpetuate FGM. At the same time, it is important to consider the potential risks of teaching about FGM, such as the potential for cultural insensitivity or victim-blaming. Ultimately, it is important to ensure that education about FGM is done in a way that is sensitive, respectful and empowering.